CX5 Entry vs HRV 1.5L i-VTEC DX Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
210 km/h
190 km/h
/
4
/
1490 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
17
/
4550
4348 mm
1840
1772 mm
1675
1605 mm
2700
2610 mm
965
688 L
/
5 Doors
Fuel Economy
/
12 Km/L
56
50 L
/
12 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Safety
6
/
✓
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
Transmission
6-Speed Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
1.9 L - 2.5 L
1.5 L - 1.8 L
151 BHP - 188 BHP
119 - 140 BHP
6 Sp Skyactiv with Sports Mode & 6 Speed Skyactiv with Sports+Offroad Mode & Automatic
Automatic & CVT
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
5 - 5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
2.5 L
1.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
190 BHP
119 BHP
251 Nm
145 Nm
/
In-Line
/
None
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
CX5 Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Rear Camera
- Number of Airbags
- ABS
HRV 1.5L i-VTEC DX
- 360 Degree camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Flexible interior design and practical space
- Fuel efficiency and economical maintenance
- Driving comfort and good wheelbase adjustment
Negative
- Insufficient engine performance in some cases
- The quality of interior materials needs to be improved
- Standard equipment is limited in basic categories
Related comparisons
Editor's PickCX5 Entry
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose CX5 Entry if you care more about price; choose HRV 1.5L i-VTEC DX if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, CX5 Entry has a fuel consumption of No data, while HRV 1.5L i-VTEC DX has a fuel consumption of 8.33. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, CX5 Entry has a wheelbase of 2700, while HRV 1.5L i-VTEC DX has a wheelbase of 2610 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, CX5 Entry, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. CX5 Entry uses Front Drive, while HRV 1.5L i-VTEC DX uses Front Wheel Drive.