CX5 Entry vs Atto 8 Premium FWD Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
210 km/h
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
17
20
4550
5040
1840
1996
1675
1760
2700
2950
965
/
/
5.9 M
/
165 mm
Fuel Economy
/
34.7
56
60
/
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
/
Front Row Seats
/
10.25
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
PU
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
6
Front Driver's & Passenger's Airbag/ Farside Airbag/Front & Rear Side Airbags/Integrated Side Air Curtain
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
/
15.6
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
10
Battery/Charging
/
40
Transmission
6-Speed Automatic
AT
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Front Drive
/
Double Wishbone Type
/
Five-link
Wheels/brakes
/
255/50 R20
/
255/50 R20
Key Spec
1.9 L - 2.5 L
1.5
151 BHP - 188 BHP
275 - 480
6 Sp Skyactiv with Sports Mode & 6 Speed Skyactiv with Sports+Offroad Mode & Automatic
AT
Gasoline & Petrol
Hybrid
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
5 - 7
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.5 L
1.5
Gasoline
Hybrid
190 BHP
275
251 Nm
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Sport / Normal / Eco
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
CX5 Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Rear Camera
- Number of Airbags
- ABS
Atto 8 Premium FWD
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree Camera
- Keyless Entry
- Rear Cross Traffic Alert
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Intelligent Emergency Call
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
- Seat belt reminder
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose CX5 Entry if you care more about price; choose Atto 8 Premium FWD if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, CX5 Entry has a fuel consumption of No data, while Atto 8 Premium FWD has a fuel consumption of 2.88. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, CX5 Entry has a wheelbase of 2700, while Atto 8 Premium FWD has a wheelbase of 2950. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Atto 8 Premium FWD, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. CX5 Entry uses Front Drive, while Atto 8 Premium FWD uses Front Drive.