CX5 Entry vs Highlander LE HEV 4X2 Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

210 km/h

/

Dimensions

5 Seater

7 Seater

17

18

4550

4950

1840

1930

1675

1730

2700

/

965

/

/

5

Fuel Economy

/

20.7

56

65

/

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Manual

Interior

/

Driver Seat

/

7

/

/

Driver Seat

/

Fabric

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

6

Driver & Front Passenger + Knee + Side + Curtain

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

8

/

/

/

6

Transmission

6-Speed Automatic

Electronically controlled Continuously Variable Transmission (ECVT)

Chassis & Steering

Front Drive

Front Drive

Wheels/brakes

/

235/65 R18

/

235/65 R18

Key Spec

1.9 L - 2.5 L

2.5 L - 2.5 L

151 BHP - 188 BHP

240 BHP - 240 BHP

6 Sp Skyactiv with Sports Mode & 6 Speed Skyactiv with Sports+Offroad Mode & Automatic

Automatic & CVT & eCVT & Electronically controlled Continuously Variable Transmission (ECVT)

Gasoline & Petrol

Hybrid & Hybrid

TBD

TBD

5 - 5

7 Seater - 7 Seater

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

Engine

2.5 L

2.5 L

Gasoline

Hybrid

190 BHP

240 BHP

251 Nm

/

/

91

Technologies

/

/

/

/

ECO/NORMAL/SPORT

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • CX5 Entry

    • Parking sensor rear
    • Rear Camera
    • Number of Airbags
    • ABS
  • Highlander LE HEV 4X2

    • Electronic Engine Immobilizer
    • Push Button Start
    • Keyless Entry
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Number of Airbags
    • Collision Detection
    • Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
    • ABS
    • Lane Departure Warning
    • Lane Keeping Assist

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickCX5 Entry

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose CX5 Entry if you care more about price; choose Highlander LE HEV 4X2 if you care more about power.

Popular Car Comparisons

Mazda | CX5 Entry

VS

BYD | Atto 3 Premium

Mazda | CX5 Entry

VS

Toyota | Corolla Cross 1.8L XL (HEV)

Mazda | CX5 Entry

VS

Honda | HRV 1.5L i-VTEC DX

Mazda | CX5 Entry

VS

Chery | Tiggo8 Pro Max COM

Mazda | CX5 Entry

VS

BYD | Atto 3 Comfort

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, CX5 Entry has a fuel consumption of No data, while Highlander LE HEV 4X2 has a fuel consumption of 4.83. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, CX5 Entry has a wheelbase of 2700, while Highlander LE HEV 4X2 has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. CX5 Entry uses Front Drive, while Highlander LE HEV 4X2 uses Front Drive.