EQS 580 4MATIC vs Mercedes-AMG GLE 63 S 4MATIC+ Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
220 km/h
280 km/h
GCC
European
/
8
/
3998 cc
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4 Doors
4 Doors
5216 mm
4,954 mm
2103 mm
1,947 mm
1503 mm
1,782 mm
3120 mm
2,995 mm
430 L
500 L
/
200 m
Fuel Economy
/
12.5
/
85 L
/
6.8 Km/L
Comfort
✓
Smart Entry
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
Leather
Digital
Digital
✓
None
✓
Electric
✓
Bucket
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
12.3
✓
Android LCD
✓
14
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Single-speed automatic (EV)
9-speed automatic
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
TBD
/
335 hp - 525 BHP
367 BHP - 625 hp
Automatic & Single-speed automatic & Single-speed automatic (EV)
9-speed automatic
Electric
Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol
525 km - 595 km
/
5 - 5
5 - 5
/
3.0 L - 4.0 L
/
TBD
Exterior
✓
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
/
4.0 L
Electric
Hybrid
525 BHP
625 hp
855 Nm
850 Nm
/
V
/
Twin Turbo
/
4
Motor
9
/
options.Lithium
/
390–395 kW
/
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
EQS 580 4MATIC
- Remote key types
Mercedes-AMG GLE 63 S 4MATIC+
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose EQS 580 4MATIC if you care more about interior space; choose Mercedes-AMG GLE 63 S 4MATIC+ if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, EQS 580 4MATIC has a fuel consumption of No data, while Mercedes-AMG GLE 63 S 4MATIC+ has a fuel consumption of 8. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, EQS 580 4MATIC has a wheelbase of 3120 mm, while Mercedes-AMG GLE 63 S 4MATIC+ has a wheelbase of 2,995 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, EQS 580 4MATIC, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. EQS 580 4MATIC uses All Wheel Drive, while Mercedes-AMG GLE 63 S 4MATIC+ uses All Wheel Drive.