Ford Ranger 2024 3.2L Wild Trak 4X4 vs AT4 5.3L Comparison

Car Information

10.6

/

/

Engine / Motor

175

/

5

/

Dimensions

5 Seater

5

5.362

5,890

1.976

2,062

1.816

1,917

3.221

/

1180

/

/

18" or 20"

Fuel Economy

11.1

9

80

91

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Front Row Seats

/

/

Front Row Seats

/

Front Row Seats

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

/

/

13.4"

/

/

Transmission

/

Automatic

10 speed AT

Chassis & Steering

All Wheel Drive

/

/

Off-Road Suspension and Rancho

Key Spec

2.0 L - 3.2 L

6.6 L - 6.6 L

118 BHP - 392 BHP

310 HP - 420 HP

10AT & 6MT & AT & Automatic & Manual

10 speed AT & 10-Speed Automatic & 8 speed AT & AT & Automatic

Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol

Gasoline

TBD

TBD

3 Seater - 5

5 - 6 Seater

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

black

/

Engine

3.2 L

5.3L

Diesel

Gasoline

200 BHP

355 HP

470

519 Nm

/

V

/

/

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Ford Ranger 2024 3.2L Wild Trak 4X4

    • Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
    • Electronic Engine Immobilizer
    • Cool Box
    • Rear Defogger
    • Push Button Start
    • Keyless Entry
    • Rear Camera
    • Number of Airbags
    • Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • ABS
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
  • AT4 5.3L

    • 360 Degree Camera
    • Rear Camera
    • Rear Cross Traffic Alert
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Auto Door Lock
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Lane Departure Warning
    • Lane Keeping Assist

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickFord Ranger 2024 3.2L Wild Trak 4X4

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Ford Ranger 2024 3.2L Wild Trak 4X4 if you care more about price; choose AT4 5.3L if you care more about power.

Popular Car Comparisons

Ford | Ford Ranger 2024 3.2L Wild Trak 4X4

VS

Ford | Ford F 150 2018 3.5L EcoBoost Crew Cab XLT (Sport Pack) Special Edition

Ford | Ford Ranger 2024 3.2L Wild Trak 4X4

VS

Ford | Ford F 150 2018 3.5L EcoBoost Crew Cab XLT

Ford | Ford Ranger 2024 3.2L Wild Trak 4X4

VS

Ford | Ford F 150 2018 5.0L Super Cab Lariat FX4 (Luxury+Chrome Pack)

Ford | Ford Ranger 2024 3.2L Wild Trak 4X4

VS

GMC | AT4 5.3L

Ford | Ford Ranger 2024 3.2L Wild Trak 4X4

VS

Ram | RAM 1500 2024 3.6L BigHorn

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Ford Ranger 2024 3.2L Wild Trak 4X4 has a fuel consumption of 9.01, while AT4 5.3L has a fuel consumption of 11.11. Therefore, Ford Ranger 2024 3.2L Wild Trak 4X4 is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Ford Ranger 2024 3.2L Wild Trak 4X4 has a wheelbase of 3.221, while AT4 5.3L has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Ford Ranger 2024 3.2L Wild Trak 4X4 uses All Wheel Drive, while AT4 5.3L uses No data.