Ford Ranger 2024 3.2L Wild Trak 4X4 vs RAM 1500 2024 3.6L BigHorn Comparison

Car Information

10.6

/

/

Engine / Motor

175

175

5

6

Dimensions

5 Seater

3 Seater

5.362

5817

1.976

2018

1.816

1968

3.221

3569

1180

1500

Fuel Economy

11.1

10.4

80

87

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

/

/

/

Transmission

/

Automatic

Automatic

/

Chassis & Steering

All Wheel Drive

All Wheel Drive

/

Wheels/brakes

/

/

Key Spec

2.0 L - 3.2 L

3.6 L - 5.7 L

118 BHP - 392 BHP

305 BHP - 395 BHP

10AT & 6MT & AT & Automatic & Manual

Automatic

Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol

Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

3 Seater - 5

3 Seater - 5 Seater

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

3.2 L

3.6 L

Diesel

Gasoline

200 BHP

305 BHP

470

364

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Ford Ranger 2024 3.2L Wild Trak 4X4

    • Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
    • Electronic Engine Immobilizer
    • Cool Box
    • Rear Defogger
    • Push Button Start
    • Keyless Entry
    • Rear Camera
    • Number of Airbags
    • Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • ABS
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
  • RAM 1500 2024 3.6L BigHorn

    • Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Rear Defogger
    • Push Button Start
    • Temperature Display
    • Keyless Entry
    • Welcome Light
    • Rear Camera
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Runflat Tyres
    • Advanced Air Bags System (AABS)
    • Pedestrian airbag
    • Fire Extinguisher
    • Active Understeer Control (AUC)
    • Active Bonnet
    • Acceleration Skid Control
    • Collision Detection
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Knee Bag - Driver
    • Crash Auto Door Unlock
    • Auto Door Lock
    • Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Active braking

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickFord Ranger 2024 3.2L Wild Trak 4X4

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Ford Ranger 2024 3.2L Wild Trak 4X4 if you care more about price; choose RAM 1500 2024 3.6L BigHorn if you care more about interior space.

Popular Car Comparisons

Ford | Ford Ranger 2024 3.2L Wild Trak 4X4

VS

Ford | Ford F 150 2018 3.5L EcoBoost Crew Cab XLT (Sport Pack) Special Edition

Ford | Ford Ranger 2024 3.2L Wild Trak 4X4

VS

Ford | Ford F 150 2018 3.5L EcoBoost Crew Cab XLT

Ford | Ford Ranger 2024 3.2L Wild Trak 4X4

VS

Ford | Ford F 150 2018 5.0L Super Cab Lariat FX4 (Luxury+Chrome Pack)

Ford | Ford Ranger 2024 3.2L Wild Trak 4X4

VS

GMC | AT4 5.3L

Ford | Ford Ranger 2024 3.2L Wild Trak 4X4

VS

Ram | RAM 1500 2024 3.6L BigHorn

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Ford Ranger 2024 3.2L Wild Trak 4X4 has a fuel consumption of 9.01, while RAM 1500 2024 3.6L BigHorn has a fuel consumption of 9.62. Therefore, Ford Ranger 2024 3.2L Wild Trak 4X4 is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Ford Ranger 2024 3.2L Wild Trak 4X4 has a wheelbase of 3.221, while RAM 1500 2024 3.6L BigHorn has a wheelbase of 3569. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, RAM 1500 2024 3.6L BigHorn, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Ford Ranger 2024 3.2L Wild Trak 4X4 uses All Wheel Drive, while RAM 1500 2024 3.6L BigHorn uses All Wheel Drive.