Ford Ranger 2024 3.2L Wild Trak 4X4 vs Ford F 150 2018 3.5L EcoBoost Crew Cab XLT Comparison
Car Information
10.6
6.0
✓
✓
Engine / Motor
175
160
5
6
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
5.362
5.890
1.976
2.463
1.816
1.948
3.221
3.670
1180
1568
Fuel Economy
11.1
8.9
80
87
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
Transmission
✓
/
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.0 L - 3.2 L
3.3 L - 6.2 L
118 BHP - 392 BHP
292 BHP - 770 BHP
10AT & 6MT & AT & Automatic & Manual
Automatic & CVT
Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol
TBD
TBD
3 Seater - 5
3 Seater - 6 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
3.2 L
3.5 L
Diesel
Petrol
200 BHP
365 BHP
470
570
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Ford Ranger 2024 3.2L Wild Trak 4X4
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Cool Box
- Rear Defogger
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Rear Camera
- Number of Airbags
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
Ford F 150 2018 3.5L EcoBoost Crew Cab XLT
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Blind Spot Warning
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickFord Ranger 2024 3.2L Wild Trak 4X4
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Ford Ranger 2024 3.2L Wild Trak 4X4 if you care more about price; choose Ford F 150 2018 3.5L EcoBoost Crew Cab XLT if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Ford Ranger 2024 3.2L Wild Trak 4X4 has a fuel consumption of 9.01, while Ford F 150 2018 3.5L EcoBoost Crew Cab XLT has a fuel consumption of 11.24. Therefore, Ford Ranger 2024 3.2L Wild Trak 4X4 is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Ford Ranger 2024 3.2L Wild Trak 4X4 has a wheelbase of 3.221, while Ford F 150 2018 3.5L EcoBoost Crew Cab XLT has a wheelbase of 3.670. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Ford F 150 2018 3.5L EcoBoost Crew Cab XLT, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Ford Ranger 2024 3.2L Wild Trak 4X4 uses All Wheel Drive, while Ford F 150 2018 3.5L EcoBoost Crew Cab XLT uses All Wheel Drive.