Kodiaq 1.4 TSI Ambition (7-seater) vs Alreem 2.0T High Line (4x4) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
194 km/h
/
Dimensions
7 Seater
7 Seater
4697 mm
4771 mm
1882 mm
1870 mm
1681 mm
1828 mm
2791 mm
2790 mm
650 L
/
Fuel Economy
14.1 Km/L
10 Km/L
60 L
/
14.1 Km/L
10 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
Safety
✓
✓
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
1.4 L - 2.0 L
2.0 L
150 BHP - 190 hp
215 BHP
7-speed DSG
TBD
Gasoline
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
7 - 7
7 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
Engine
1.4 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
150 BHP
215 BHP
250 Nm
280 Nm
Comparison of configuration highlights
Kodiaq 1.4 TSI Ambition (7-seater)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Alreem 2.0T High Line (4x4)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickAlreem 2.0T High Line (4x4)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Kodiaq 1.4 TSI Ambition (7-seater) if you care more about fuel economy; choose Alreem 2.0T High Line (4x4) if you care more about power.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Kodiaq 1.4 TSI Ambition (7-seater) has a fuel consumption of 7.09, while Alreem 2.0T High Line (4x4) has a fuel consumption of 10. Therefore, Kodiaq 1.4 TSI Ambition (7-seater) is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Kodiaq 1.4 TSI Ambition (7-seater) has a wheelbase of 2791 mm, while Alreem 2.0T High Line (4x4) has a wheelbase of 2790 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Kodiaq 1.4 TSI Ambition (7-seater), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Kodiaq 1.4 TSI Ambition (7-seater) uses Front Wheel Drive, while Alreem 2.0T High Line (4x4) uses All Wheel Drive.