Kodiaq 1.4 TSI Ambition (7-seater) vs H2 1.5T Intelligent Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
194 km/h
170 km/h
Dimensions
7 Seater
5 Seater
4697 mm
4335 mm
1882 mm
1814 mm
1681 mm
1695 mm
2791 mm
2560 mm
650 L
500 L
Fuel Economy
14.1 Km/L
12.2 Km/L
60 L
55 L
14.1 Km/L
12.2 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
Safety
✓
✓
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
1.4 L - 2.0 L
1.5 L
150 BHP - 190 hp
147 BHP - 150 BHP
7-speed DSG
Automatic
Gasoline
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
7 - 7
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
Engine
1.4 L
1.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
150 BHP
148 BHP
250 Nm
210 Nm
Comparison of configuration highlights
Kodiaq 1.4 TSI Ambition (7-seater)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
H2 1.5T Intelligent
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickH2 1.5T Intelligent
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Kodiaq 1.4 TSI Ambition (7-seater) if you care more about fuel economy; choose H2 1.5T Intelligent if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Kodiaq 1.4 TSI Ambition (7-seater) has a fuel consumption of 7.09, while H2 1.5T Intelligent has a fuel consumption of 8.2. Therefore, Kodiaq 1.4 TSI Ambition (7-seater) is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Kodiaq 1.4 TSI Ambition (7-seater) has a wheelbase of 2791 mm, while H2 1.5T Intelligent has a wheelbase of 2560 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Kodiaq 1.4 TSI Ambition (7-seater), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Kodiaq 1.4 TSI Ambition (7-seater) uses Front Wheel Drive, while H2 1.5T Intelligent uses Front Wheel Drive.