Kodiaq 2.0 TSI Sport line (AWD) 7-seater vs Alreem 2.0T High Line (4x4) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
207 km/h
/
Dimensions
7 Seater
7 Seater
4697 mm
4771 mm
1882 mm
1870 mm
1681 mm
1828 mm
2791 mm
2790 mm
650 L
/
Fuel Economy
13.5 Km/L
10 Km/L
60 L
/
13.5 Km/L
10 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
Safety
✓
✓
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
Engine
2.0 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
180 BHP
215 BHP
320 Nm
280 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Kodiaq 2.0 TSI Sport line (AWD) 7-seater
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Alreem 2.0T High Line (4x4)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickAlreem 2.0T High Line (4x4)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Kodiaq 2.0 TSI Sport line (AWD) 7-seater if you care more about fuel economy; choose Alreem 2.0T High Line (4x4) if you care more about power.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Kodiaq 2.0 TSI Sport line (AWD) 7-seater has a fuel consumption of 7.41, while Alreem 2.0T High Line (4x4) has a fuel consumption of 10. Therefore, Kodiaq 2.0 TSI Sport line (AWD) 7-seater is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Kodiaq 2.0 TSI Sport line (AWD) 7-seater has a wheelbase of 2791 mm, while Alreem 2.0T High Line (4x4) has a wheelbase of 2790 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Kodiaq 2.0 TSI Sport line (AWD) 7-seater, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Kodiaq 2.0 TSI Sport line (AWD) 7-seater uses All Wheel Drive, while Alreem 2.0T High Line (4x4) uses All Wheel Drive.