Kodiaq 2.0 TSI Sport line (AWD) 7-seater vs EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
207 km/h
160 km/h
Dimensions
7 Seater
5 Seater
4697 mm
4490 mm
1882 mm
1874 mm
1681 mm
1613 mm
2791 mm
2750 mm
650 L
/
Fuel Economy
13.5 Km/L
/
60 L
/
13.5 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Interior
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
1.4 L - 2.0 L
/
150 BHP - 190 hp
153 BHP - 305 BHP
7-speed DSG
TBD
Gasoline
Electric
TBD
/
7 - 7
5 Seater
/
TBD
/
TBD
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
Engine
2.0 L
/
Gasoline
Electric
180 BHP
153 BHP
320 Nm
340 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Kodiaq 2.0 TSI Sport line (AWD) 7-seater
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickEHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Kodiaq 2.0 TSI Sport line (AWD) 7-seater if you care more about interior space; choose EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD) if you care more about power.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Kodiaq 2.0 TSI Sport line (AWD) 7-seater has a fuel consumption of 7.41, while EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD) has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Kodiaq 2.0 TSI Sport line (AWD) 7-seater has a wheelbase of 2791 mm, while EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD) has a wheelbase of 2750 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Kodiaq 2.0 TSI Sport line (AWD) 7-seater, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Kodiaq 2.0 TSI Sport line (AWD) 7-seater uses All Wheel Drive, while EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD) uses Front Wheel Drive.