Kodiaq 2.0 TSI Sport line (AWD) 7-seater vs GS Sport 1.8L Classic Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
207 km/h
185 km/h
Dimensions
7 Seater
5 Seater
4697 mm
4440 mm
1882 mm
1833 mm
1681 mm
1560 mm
2791 mm
2700 mm
650 L
330 L
Fuel Economy
13.5 Km/L
13.5 Km/L
60 L
60 L
13.5 Km/L
13.5 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Safety
✓
✓
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
1.4 L - 2.0 L
1.8 L
150 BHP - 190 hp
130 BHP - 133 BHP
7-speed DSG
Automatic
Gasoline
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
7 - 7
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
Engine
2.0 L
1.8 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
180 BHP
130 BHP
320 Nm
170 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Kodiaq 2.0 TSI Sport line (AWD) 7-seater
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
GS Sport 1.8L Classic
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickGS Sport 1.8L Classic
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Kodiaq 2.0 TSI Sport line (AWD) 7-seater if you care more about interior space; choose GS Sport 1.8L Classic if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Kodiaq 2.0 TSI Sport line (AWD) 7-seater has a fuel consumption of 7.41, while GS Sport 1.8L Classic has a fuel consumption of 7.41. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Kodiaq 2.0 TSI Sport line (AWD) 7-seater has a wheelbase of 2791 mm, while GS Sport 1.8L Classic has a wheelbase of 2700 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Kodiaq 2.0 TSI Sport line (AWD) 7-seater, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Kodiaq 2.0 TSI Sport line (AWD) 7-seater uses All Wheel Drive, while GS Sport 1.8L Classic uses Front Wheel Drive.