Mazda 3 Hatchback 2.0L Allure vs 695 1.4T Rivale Hard Top Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
225 km/h
Dimensions
5 Seater
4 Seater
/
3657 mm
/
1647 mm
/
1485 mm
/
2300 mm
/
185 L
Fuel Economy
17.8
17.2 Km/L
/
35 L
/
17.2 Km/L
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
/
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.0 L - 2.0 L
1.4 L
151 BHP - 153 HP
180 BHP
6 SPEED SKYACTIV WITH SPORTS MODE & Automatic
Automatic
Gasoline
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
4 Seater
Engine
2.0 L
1.4 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
151 BHP
180 BHP
/
250 Nm
Exterior
/
✓
Technologies
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Mazda 3 Hatchback 2.0L Allure
695 1.4T Rivale Hard Top
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickMazda 3 Hatchback 2.0L Allure
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Mazda 3 Hatchback 2.0L Allure if you care more about price; choose 695 1.4T Rivale Hard Top if you care more about power.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Mazda 3 Hatchback 2.0L Allure has a fuel consumption of 5.62, while 695 1.4T Rivale Hard Top has a fuel consumption of 5.81. Therefore, Mazda 3 Hatchback 2.0L Allure is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Mazda 3 Hatchback 2.0L Allure has a wheelbase of No data, while 695 1.4T Rivale Hard Top has a wheelbase of 2300 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Mazda 3 Hatchback 2.0L Allure uses No data, while 695 1.4T Rivale Hard Top uses Front Wheel Drive.