Mazda 3 Hatchback 2.0L Allure vs Volvo V40 2018 2.0 T5 R-Design Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
240
/
4
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
/
4369
/
2041
/
1420
/
2647
/
324
Fuel Economy
17.8
12.7
/
62
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
/
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
/
✓
Key Spec
2.0 L - 2.0 L
2.0 L
151 BHP - 153 HP
180 BHP - 253 BHP
6 SPEED SKYACTIV WITH SPORTS MODE & Automatic
Automatic
Gasoline
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
5 Seater
Engine
2.0 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
151 BHP
245 BHP
/
350
Exterior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Mazda 3 Hatchback 2.0L Allure
Volvo V40 2018 2.0 T5 R-Design
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Keyless Entry
- Seats - Comfort
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Intelligent Emergency Call
- Pedestrian airbag
- First Aid Kit
- Active Bonnet
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Knee Bag - Driver
- Speed Limiter
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
- Lane Departure Warning
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickMazda 3 Hatchback 2.0L Allure
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Mazda 3 Hatchback 2.0L Allure if you care more about price; choose Volvo V40 2018 2.0 T5 R-Design if you care more about power.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Mazda 3 Hatchback 2.0L Allure has a fuel consumption of 5.62, while Volvo V40 2018 2.0 T5 R-Design has a fuel consumption of 7.87. Therefore, Mazda 3 Hatchback 2.0L Allure is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Mazda 3 Hatchback 2.0L Allure has a wheelbase of No data, while Volvo V40 2018 2.0 T5 R-Design has a wheelbase of 2647. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Mazda 3 Hatchback 2.0L Allure uses No data, while Volvo V40 2018 2.0 T5 R-Design uses Front Wheel Drive.