CarteaCompare CarsMazda 3 Hatchback 2.0L Allure vs E30X Comfort

Mazda 3 Hatchback 2.0L Allure vs E30X Comfort Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

/

180 km/h

/

Chinese

Dimensions

5 Seater

5 Seater

/

4 Doors

/

4025 mm

/

1770 mm

/

1560 mm

/

2620 mm

/

250 L

/

130 m

Fuel Economy

17.8

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Keyless Entry

/

Interior

/

/

Leather

/

Digital

/

Single

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

Standard

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

12.8

/

/

/

/

Android LCD

/

/

4

Transmission

Automatic

/

Chassis & Steering

/

Front Wheel Drive

Key Spec

2.0 L - 2.0 L

/

151 BHP - 153 HP

134 BHP

6 SPEED SKYACTIV WITH SPORTS MODE & Automatic

AT

Gasoline

Electric

TBD

/

5 - 5

4 Seater - 5 Seater

/

TBD

/

400 km

Engine

2.0 L

/

Gasoline

Electric

151 BHP

134 BHP

/

175 Nm

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

LED with Halogen

/

/

Motor

/

7.5

/

options.Cellular Battery

Technologies

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Mazda 3 Hatchback 2.0L Allure

    • E30X Comfort

      • Electronic engine immobilizer
      • Rear Defogger
      • Rear Power Outlet
      • Heated Side Mirrors
      • Parking sensor rear
      • Heater
      • Rear Camera
      • Headlight On Reminder
      • Remote key types
      • Steering Adjustment
      • Anti-Theft Alarm System
      • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
      • Driver Seat Belt Warning
      • ABS
      • EBD/CBC
      • EBA/BA
      • Passive Pedestrian Protection
      • Child Lock
      • Speed Alert

    Review Comparison

    Positive

    • No data found

    Negative

    • No data found

    Positive

    • No data found

    Negative

    • No data found

    Related comparisons

    Editor's PickE30X Comfort

    Expert / Editor Recommendation

    Choose Mazda 3 Hatchback 2.0L Allure if you care more about power; choose E30X Comfort if you care more about price.

    Popular Car Comparisons

    Mazda | Mazda 3 Hatchback 2.0L Allure

    VS

    Volvo | Volvo V40 2018 2.0 T5 R-Design

    Mazda | Mazda 3 Hatchback 2.0L Allure

    VS

    Volkswagen | Volkswagen Golf GTI 2020 2.0T S

    Mazda | Mazda 3 Hatchback 2.0L Allure

    VS

    JAC | E30X Comfort

    Mazda | Mazda 3 Hatchback 2.0L Allure

    VS

    JAC | E30X Comfort

    Mazda | Mazda 3 Hatchback 2.0L Allure

    VS

    JAC | JAC E30X 2024 51.5 kWh

    Q&A

    • According to fuel consumption data, Mazda 3 Hatchback 2.0L Allure has a fuel consumption of 5.62, while E30X Comfort has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
    • In terms of interior space, Mazda 3 Hatchback 2.0L Allure has a wheelbase of No data, while E30X Comfort has a wheelbase of 2620 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
    • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Mazda 3 Hatchback 2.0L Allure uses No data, while E30X Comfort uses Front Wheel Drive.