Mazda 3 Hatchback 2.0L Allure vs JAC E30X 2024 51.5 kWh Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
N/A, Electric
Dimensions
5 Seater
4 Seater
/
4025
/
1770
/
1560
/
2620
/
300
Fuel Economy
17.8
/
Comfort
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
/
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.0 L - 2.0 L
/
151 BHP - 153 HP
134 BHP
6 SPEED SKYACTIV WITH SPORTS MODE & Automatic
AT
Gasoline
Electric
TBD
/
5 - 5
4 Seater - 5 Seater
/
TBD
/
400 km
Engine
2.0 L
0.0 L
Gasoline
Electric
151 BHP
134 BHP
/
175
Exterior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Mazda 3 Hatchback 2.0L Allure
JAC E30X 2024 51.5 kWh
- 360 Degree camera
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Collision Detection
- Auto Door Lock
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickJAC E30X 2024 51.5 kWh
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Mazda 3 Hatchback 2.0L Allure if you care more about power; choose JAC E30X 2024 51.5 kWh if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Mazda 3 Hatchback 2.0L Allure has a fuel consumption of 5.62, while JAC E30X 2024 51.5 kWh has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Mazda 3 Hatchback 2.0L Allure has a wheelbase of No data, while JAC E30X 2024 51.5 kWh has a wheelbase of 2620. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Mazda 3 Hatchback 2.0L Allure uses No data, while JAC E30X 2024 51.5 kWh uses Front Wheel Drive.