Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD vs ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
190
193 km/h
6
/
Dimensions
8
5 Seater
5046
4355 mm
1975
1810 mm
1795
1625 mm
2900
2670 mm
470
358 L
Fuel Economy
9.4
12.5 Km/L
74
63 L
/
12.5 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
9AT
/
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
Key Spec
3.5 L
2.0 L
254 BHP - 271 BHP
150 BHP
9AT & Automatic & CVT
Automatic & CVT
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
7 - 8
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
3.5 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
V6 9AT
/
271 BHP
150 BHP
271 @ 6,400
/
340
197 Nm
340 @ 4,800
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- Push Button Start
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Collision Detection
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Active braking
ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- Spacious interior space and flexible storage
- Comfortable seating and luxurious driving experience
- Comprehensive and advanced security equipment
Negative
- Medium fuel economy
- Traditional interior design needs updating
- Noticeable noise during high speeds
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD if you care more about interior space; choose ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD has a fuel consumption of 10.64, while ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option has a fuel consumption of 8. Therefore, ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD has a wheelbase of 2900, while ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option has a wheelbase of 2670 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD , offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD uses Front Wheel Drive, while ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option uses Front Wheel Drive.