Nissan Z AT Performance 3.0L vs Challenger R/T 5.7L (375 HP) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
260 km/h
280 km/h
6
8
2996 cc
5700 cc
GCC
GCC
Dimensions
2 Seater
5 Seater
2 Doors
2 Doors
4380 mm
5027 mm
1845 mm
1923 mm
1315 mm
1465 mm
2550 mm
2946 mm
125 mm
132 m
/
459 L
Fuel Economy
9.5
6 Km/L
62 L
70 L
8 Km/L
6 Km/L
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Keyless Entry
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Manual
/
✓
/
✓
/
Bucket
Safety
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
8.4
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
6
Transmission
Auto
/
Chassis & Steering
Rear Wheel Drive
Rear Wheel Drive
Double-Wishbone
/
Multi-Link Wishbone
/
Electric Power Steering (EPS)
/
Key Spec
3.0 L - 3.0 L
3.6 L - 6.4 L
400 BHP - 420 BHP
300 BHP - 797 BHP
Auto & Automatic & Manual
Automatic & Manual
Petrol & Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
2 Seater - 4 Seater
2 Seater - 5 Seater
Engine
V
V
3.0 L
5.7 L
Petrol
Gasoline
3.0-litre twin-turbo V6
/
Twin Turbo
/
24
4
400 BHP
375 BHP
475 Nm
528 Nm
Exterior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Nissan Z AT Performance 3.0L
Challenger R/T 5.7L (375 HP)
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- Power performance V6 dual turbo engine
- Attractive sporty and modern design
- Good value for the price
Negative
- Limited interior space for rear seats
- Small luggage storage capacity
- The infotainment system is relatively old
Positive
- Powerful engine performance and amazing acceleration
- Classic and bold exterior design
- Comfortable and spacious interior space
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- Difficulty with control and low flexibility
- Lack of Intelligent Systems Technologies
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Nissan Z AT Performance 3.0L if you care more about price; choose Challenger R/T 5.7L (375 HP) if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Nissan Z AT Performance 3.0L has a fuel consumption of 10.53, while Challenger R/T 5.7L (375 HP) has a fuel consumption of 16.67. Therefore, Nissan Z AT Performance 3.0L is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Nissan Z AT Performance 3.0L has a wheelbase of 2550 mm , while Challenger R/T 5.7L (375 HP) has a wheelbase of 2946 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Challenger R/T 5.7L (375 HP), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Nissan Z AT Performance 3.0L uses Rear Wheel Drive , while Challenger R/T 5.7L (375 HP) uses Rear Wheel Drive.