Nissan Z AT Performance 3.0L vs Dodge Challenger 2024 5.7L R/T Plus Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
260 km/h
250
6
8
2996 cc
/
GCC
/
Dimensions
2 Seater
5 Seater
2 Doors
/
4380 mm
5.027
1845 mm
1.923
1315 mm
1.460
2550 mm
2.950
125 mm
/
/
✓
/
459
Fuel Economy
9.5
8.1
62 L
70
8 Km/L
/
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Auto
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Rear Wheel Drive
Rear Wheel Drive
Double-Wishbone
/
Multi-Link Wishbone
/
Electric Power Steering (EPS)
/
Key Spec
3.0 L - 3.0 L
3.6 L - 6.4 L
400 BHP - 420 BHP
300 BHP - 797 BHP
Auto & Automatic & Manual
Automatic & Manual
Petrol & Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
2 Seater - 4 Seater
2 Seater - 5 Seater
Engine
V
/
3.0 L
5.7 L
Petrol
Petrol
3.0-litre twin-turbo V6
/
Twin Turbo
/
24
/
400 BHP
375 BHP
475 Nm
555
Exterior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Nissan Z AT Performance 3.0L
Dodge Challenger 2024 5.7L R/T Plus
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Seats - Comfort
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- Power performance V6 dual turbo engine
- Attractive sporty and modern design
- Good value for the price
Negative
- Limited interior space for rear seats
- Small luggage storage capacity
- The infotainment system is relatively old
Positive
- Powerful engine performance and amazing acceleration
- Classic and bold exterior design
- Comfortable and spacious interior space
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- Difficulty with control and low flexibility
- Lack of Intelligent Systems Technologies
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Nissan Z AT Performance 3.0L if you care more about price; choose Dodge Challenger 2024 5.7L R/T Plus if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Nissan Z AT Performance 3.0L has a fuel consumption of 10.53, while Dodge Challenger 2024 5.7L R/T Plus has a fuel consumption of 12.35. Therefore, Nissan Z AT Performance 3.0L is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Nissan Z AT Performance 3.0L has a wheelbase of 2550 mm , while Dodge Challenger 2024 5.7L R/T Plus has a wheelbase of 2.950. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Nissan Z AT Performance 3.0L, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Nissan Z AT Performance 3.0L uses Rear Wheel Drive , while Dodge Challenger 2024 5.7L R/T Plus uses Rear Wheel Drive.