Nissan Z AT Performance 3.0L vs Ford Mustang 2024 5.0L V8 Fastback GT Comparison
Car Information
/
4.7
Engine / Motor
260 km/h
240
6
8
2996 cc
/
GCC
/
Dimensions
2 Seater
4 Seater
2 Doors
/
4380 mm
4.783
1845 mm
2.080
1315 mm
1.382
2550 mm
2.720
125 mm
/
/
✓
/
382
Fuel Economy
9.5
8.1
62 L
60
8 Km/L
/
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Auto
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Rear Wheel Drive
Rear Wheel Drive
Double-Wishbone
/
Multi-Link Wishbone
/
Electric Power Steering (EPS)
/
Key Spec
3.0 L - 3.0 L
2.3 L - 5.2 L
400 BHP - 420 BHP
300 BHP - 760 BHP
Auto & Automatic & Manual
10 Speed AT / 6 Speed MT & Automatic & Manual
Petrol & Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
2 Seater - 4 Seater
2 Seater - 4
Engine
V
/
3.0 L
5.0 L
Petrol
Petrol
3.0-litre twin-turbo V6
/
Twin Turbo
/
24
/
400 BHP
460 BHP
475 Nm
569
Exterior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Nissan Z AT Performance 3.0L
Ford Mustang 2024 5.0L V8 Fastback GT
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Rear Defogger
- Keyless Entry
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- ABS
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
Review Comparison
Positive
- Power performance V6 dual turbo engine
- Attractive sporty and modern design
- Good value for the price
Negative
- Limited interior space for rear seats
- Small luggage storage capacity
- The infotainment system is relatively old
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Nissan Z AT Performance 3.0L if you care more about price; choose Ford Mustang 2024 5.0L V8 Fastback GT if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Nissan Z AT Performance 3.0L has a fuel consumption of 10.53, while Ford Mustang 2024 5.0L V8 Fastback GT has a fuel consumption of 12.35. Therefore, Nissan Z AT Performance 3.0L is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Nissan Z AT Performance 3.0L has a wheelbase of 2550 mm , while Ford Mustang 2024 5.0L V8 Fastback GT has a wheelbase of 2.720. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Nissan Z AT Performance 3.0L, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Nissan Z AT Performance 3.0L uses Rear Wheel Drive , while Ford Mustang 2024 5.0L V8 Fastback GT uses Rear Wheel Drive.