Suzuki SX4 2016 Outdoor vs Alreem 2.0T High Line (4x4) Comparison
Car Information
/
SUVEngine / Motor
180
/
4
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
7 Seater
4150
4771 mm
1755
1870 mm
1605
1828 mm
2500
2790 mm
253
/
Fuel Economy
13.9
10 Km/L
42
/
/
10 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
✓
/
CVT
/
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.0 L
2.0 L
150 BHP
215 BHP
CVT
TBD
Gasoline
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
7 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.0 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
150 BHP
215 BHP
190
280 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Suzuki SX4 2016 Outdoor
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Seats - Comfort
- Steering Adjustment
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Active braking
Alreem 2.0T High Line (4x4)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickAlreem 2.0T High Line (4x4)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Suzuki SX4 2016 Outdoor if you care more about fuel economy; choose Alreem 2.0T High Line (4x4) if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Suzuki SX4 2016 Outdoor has a fuel consumption of 7.19, while Alreem 2.0T High Line (4x4) has a fuel consumption of 10. Therefore, Suzuki SX4 2016 Outdoor is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Suzuki SX4 2016 Outdoor has a wheelbase of 2500, while Alreem 2.0T High Line (4x4) has a wheelbase of 2790 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Alreem 2.0T High Line (4x4), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Suzuki SX4 2016 Outdoor uses All Wheel Drive, while Alreem 2.0T High Line (4x4) uses All Wheel Drive.