Suzuki SX4 2016 Outdoor vs EREV RWD Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
180
/
4
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
4150
4,825
1755
1,980
1605
1,620
2500
2,940
253
/
Fuel Economy
13.9
/
42
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
✓
/
CVT
Single-speed Fixed-Ratio Automatic
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
/
Key Spec
2.0 L
1.5 L - 1.5 L
150 BHP
310 - 590
CVT
AT & Single-speed Fixed-Ratio Automatic & Single-speed Fixed-Ratio Automatic.
Gasoline
Electric & Hybrid
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
2.0 L
1.5 L
Gasoline
Hybrid
150 BHP
310
190
367
/
1,152
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Suzuki SX4 2016 Outdoor
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Seats - Comfort
- Steering Adjustment
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Active braking
EREV RWD
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickSuzuki SX4 2016 Outdoor
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Suzuki SX4 2016 Outdoor if you care more about price; choose EREV RWD if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Suzuki SX4 2016 Outdoor has a fuel consumption of 7.19, while EREV RWD has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Suzuki SX4 2016 Outdoor has a wheelbase of 2500, while EREV RWD has a wheelbase of 2,940. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, EREV RWD, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Suzuki SX4 2016 Outdoor uses All Wheel Drive, while EREV RWD uses No data.