Suzuki SX4 2016 Outdoor vs Trailblazer Active AWD Comparison
Car Information
/
SUVEngine / Motor
180
180 km/h
4
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
7 Seater
4150
4406 mm
1755
1808 mm
1605
1645 mm
2500
2640 mm
253
/
Fuel Economy
13.9
/
42
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
✓
/
CVT
/
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.0 L
1.2 L - 3.6 L
150 BHP
137 BHP - 275 BHP
CVT
Automatic & CVT
Gasoline
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 Seater - 7 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
2.0 L
1.3 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
150 BHP
155 BHP
190
236 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Suzuki SX4 2016 Outdoor
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Seats - Comfort
- Steering Adjustment
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Active braking
Trailblazer Active AWD
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickTrailblazer Active AWD
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Suzuki SX4 2016 Outdoor if you care more about power; choose Trailblazer Active AWD if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Suzuki SX4 2016 Outdoor has a fuel consumption of 7.19, while Trailblazer Active AWD has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Suzuki SX4 2016 Outdoor has a wheelbase of 2500, while Trailblazer Active AWD has a wheelbase of 2640 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Trailblazer Active AWD, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Suzuki SX4 2016 Outdoor uses All Wheel Drive, while Trailblazer Active AWD uses All Wheel Drive.